Python: ASGI: Switch away from asyncio.get_event_loop().

Several users on GitHub reported issues with running Python ASGI apps on
Unit with Python 3.11.1 (this would also effect Python 3.10.9) with the
following error from Unit

  2023/01/15 22:43:22 [alert] 0#77128 [unit] Python failed to call 'asyncio.get_event_loop'

TL;DR

asyncio.get_event_loop() is currently broken due to the process of
deprecating part or all of it.

First some history.

In Unit we had this commit

  commit 8dcb0b9987033d0349a6ecf528014a9daa574787
  Author: Max Romanov <max.romanov@nginx.com>
  Date:   Thu Nov 5 00:04:59 2020 +0300

      Python: request processing in multiple threads.

One of things this did was to create a new asyncio event loop in each
thread using asyncio.new_event_loop().

It's perhaps worth noting that all these asyncio.* functions are Python
functions that we call from the C code in Unit.

Then we had this commit

  commit f27fbd9b4d2bdaddf1e7001d0d0bc5586ba04cd4
  Author: Max Romanov <max.romanov@nginx.com>
  Date:   Tue Jul 20 10:37:54 2021 +0300

      Python: using default event_loop for main thread for ASGI.

This changed things so that Unit calls asyncio.get_event_loop() in the
_main_ thread (but still calls asyncio.new_event_loop() in the other
threads).

asyncio.get_event_loop() up until recently would either return an
already running event loop or return a newly created one.

This was done for $reasons that the commit message and GitHub issue #560
hint at. But the intimation is that there can already be an event loop
running from the application (I assume it's referring to the users
application) at this point and if there is we should use it.

Now for the Python side of things.

On the main branch we had

  commit 172c0f2752d8708b6dda7b42e6c5a3519420a4e8
  Author: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
  Date:   Sun Apr 25 13:40:44 2021 +0300

      bpo-39529: Deprecate creating new event loop in asyncio.get_event_loop() (GH-23554)

This commit began the deprecating of asyncio.get_event_loop().

  commit fd38a2f0ec03b4eec5e3cfd41241d198b1ee555a
  Author: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
  Date:   Tue Dec 6 19:42:12 2022 +0200

      gh-93453: No longer create an event loop in get_event_loop() (#98440)

This turned asyncio.get_event_loop() into a RuntimeError _if_ there
isn't a current event loop.

  commit e5bd5ad70d9e549eeb80aadb4f3ccb0f2f23266d
  Author: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
  Date:   Fri Jan 13 14:40:29 2023 +0200

      gh-100160: Restore and deprecate implicit creation of an event loop (GH-100410)

This re-creates the event loop if there wasn't one and emits a
deprecation warning.

After at least the last two commits Unit no longer works with the Python
_main_ branch.

Meanwhile on the 3.11 branch we had

  commit 3fae04b10e2655a20a3aadb5e0d63e87206d0c67
  Author: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
  Date:   Tue Dec 6 17:15:44 2022 +0200

      [3.11] gh-93453: Only emit deprecation warning in asyncio.get_event_loop when a new event loop is created (#99949)

which is what caused our breakage, though perhaps unintentionally as we
get the following traceback

  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/asyncio/events.py", line 676, in get_event_loop
      f = sys._getframe(1)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  ValueError: call stack is not deep enough
  2023/01/18 02:46:10 [alert] 0#180279 [unit] Python failed to call 'asyncio.get_event_loop'

However, regardless, it is clear we need to stop using
asyncio.get_event_loop().

One option is to switch to the higher level asyncio.run() API, however
that is a rather large change.

This commit takes the simpler approach of using
asyncio.get_running_loop() (which it seems get_event_loop() will
eventually be an alias of) in the _main_ thread to return the currently
running event loop, or if there is no current event loop, it will call
asyncio.new_event_loop() to return a newly created event loop.

I believe this mimics the current behaviour. In my testing
get_event_loop() seemed to always return a newly created loop, as when
just calling get_running_loop() it would return NULL and we would fail
out.

When running two processes each with 2 threads we would get the
following loops with Python 3.11.0 and unpatched Unit

  <_UnixSelectorEventLoop running=False closed=False debug=False>
  <_UnixSelectorEventLoop running=False closed=False debug=False>
  <_UnixSelectorEventLoop running=False closed=False debug=False>
  <_UnixSelectorEventLoop running=False closed=False debug=False>

and with Python 3.11.1 and a patched Unit we would get

  <_UnixSelectorEventLoop running=False closed=False debug=False>
  <_UnixSelectorEventLoop running=False closed=False debug=False>
  <_UnixSelectorEventLoop running=False closed=False debug=False>
  <_UnixSelectorEventLoop running=False closed=False debug=False>

Tested-by: Rafał Safin <rafal.safin12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@nginx.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Clayton <a.clayton@nginx.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions