From 1dcb5383319a2e41969234d838a20f6a4316334e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Clayton <a.clayton@nginx.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 02:41:59 +0000
Subject: Expand the comment about -Wstrict-overflow on GCC

Expand on the comment on why we don't enable -Wstrict-overflow=5 on GCC.

Link: <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96658>
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Clayton <a.clayton@nginx.com>
---
 auto/cc/test | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'auto')

diff --git a/auto/cc/test b/auto/cc/test
index fdb84760..8c9f2fc1 100644
--- a/auto/cc/test
+++ b/auto/cc/test
@@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ case $NXT_CC_NAME in
         #NXT_CFLAGS="$NXT_CFLAGS -fomit-frame-pointer"
         #NXT_CFLAGS="$NXT_CFLAGS -momit-leaf-frame-pointer"
 
-        # -Wstrict-overflow is supported by GCC 4.2+.
+        # While -Wstrict-overflow is supported by GCC 4.2+,
+        # at level 3 and above it is prone to give false
+        # positives.
         #NXT_CFLAGS="$NXT_CFLAGS -Wstrict-overflow=5"
 
         NXT_CFLAGS="$NXT_CFLAGS -Wmissing-prototypes"
-- 
cgit